The answer to global warming

Ladies and gentlemen get your shorts untied because the conservatives have been lying all along. They said that there was nothing we could do to reverse global warming but here at Frontline America Inc. our dedicated team of scientists have been working diligently to propose a radical solution to the "Global Warming Crisis".

Dr. Chung Nung is a leading scientist at our lab and will now explain the simple yet effective plan for deGlobal Warming. "First we must consider all the options to date", said Dr. Nung, "we have treaties that will destroy many economies including our own. Unfortunatly these treaties are just too weak to make any sizable impact on the global readings. We have no choice but to use a simple cloud making device to reflect a vast amount of Solar Radiation back into space."

"We are very excited that this program has gotten the green light from our President", said Dr. Nung, "and we look forward to seeing it for real."


Below is a picture of Dr. Chung Nung with his coworkers putting the finishing touches on the "deGlobal Warming I".

The "deGlobal Warming I" is a relatively unmodified Minuteman III InterContinental Ballistic Missile mounting a single 300KiloTon warhead.

"We selected the Minuteman III because it was very flexible. We could aim it anywhere in the world where we could kick up a large dust cloud. When we began the program in 2001 it was suggested by the US Air Force that we look into using Iraq as a test location. That plan was scrapped a few years ago and until recently we did not have any nation that would volunteer to host the program. This all changed when we got the "go ahead" from the President to use Iran as a subject."


"We are very confident that it will work", said Dr. Nung, "and it is better than Kyoto because it will only destroy one economy. If it doesn't work the first time we have been assured by the United States Government that we can have as many as we like."

DPGC- The Future is Ours

(Uday and Qusay biting the bullet.. or TOW)

A brief history: First we created the League of Nations but it didn't work. So then we created the UN and it worked for a bit then stopped working. So we created NATO and it worked for a bit before it stopped working. Now we need the "Doesn't Play Games Crew"(DPGC).

If you have ever picked up a book on history you have seen that history is full of stories of peoples being exterminated, destroyed, and crushed. It is the responsibility of nations to protect its people. Sadly the wealthiest nations have always been the primary targets of lesser nations. For this reason the powerful nations have needed to control the world to deter invasion, attacks, and rebellion. Call it paranoia but those that have achieved have something to defend. Those nations with slum cities are willing to step up to the gambling table of war to improve their lot in life.

Attila at Chalons.

We, the civilized nations of the world, must not only sieze control of the world but we must be seen to be in control. I certainly do not advocate us doing this alone. We must organize the "haves" and bring them to the table and form a council of the willing. History will judge us differently than the media. The question is whether we will survive and thrive as a people. We must secure a stable world. Trouble makers need to be confronted and dealt with in the language they understand, brutal force.

The DPGC will be able to project power but will use such power to keep the peace. As such a force, we should not meddle with contries politics unless they are in severe breech of human rights. Invasions and any form of coercion will not be tolerated. Developement of nuclear weapons will be dealt with firmly. We will be the final arbitor. We will be the last one standing. Game time is over, school is about to start.

Don't like it? Fine. But don't step out of line or you will feel the heat.

DPGC- the Future is our Fifty First State

Islam a religion of peace.

Every religion has its dissidents, those who do not hold to the fundamentals of the faith. These people are readily labeled "cultural _____". We really should not judge a religion by its cultural following yet that is exactly what we are doing with Islam. We go to cultural Muslims to get sound bites and they will give firm testimony that Islam is a religion of peace.

Let us examine this "religion of peace". First challenge is to come up with more than two hot spots in the world that do not involve Muslims. (other than Taiwan and Korea: note that no actual fighting has been conducted in these "hot spots" for a couple of decades) Kashmir... Muslims, Bosnia... Muslims, Israel.... Muslims, Sudan.... Muslims, Iraq... Muslims, Acha before the Tsunami was an Islamic insurgency in Indonesia, Ivory Coast... Muslims, Balkins... Muslims, we could go on and on.

Then there is the discussion of religious persecution. 200,000 Christians killed in East Timor by Muslims, 60,000 killed in the Philippines, and 2.3 million Christians exterminated in Sudan in the past 10 years. Peaceful huh?

Even in moderate countries such as Jordan nearly 1,000 people are executed a year for converting to a foreign religion. If such a religion is so drenched in blood I find it hard to call it a religion of peace. The Koran does not read like a book about peace but one of war.

Now I am not advocating that we discourage cultural Muslims from practicing a peaceful version of Islam!! I would much rather cultural Islam to supplant violent Islam but let us realistically face the fact that wherever Islam is not tempered by worldliness it is violent. It tries to conquer new lands and forceably convert people to Islam and those who refuse will die.

Let us fight terrorism but lets not be so ignorant as to wonder why terrorists are all Muslims.